Guapo-Villegas

Guapo-Villegas v. City of Soledad

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 18, 20255:24-cv-00575California4,201 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 MARTIN GUAPO-VILLEGAS, Case No. 24-cv-00575-VKD

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’

v. MOTION TO DISMISS, WITH

LIMITED LEAVE TO AMEND

CITY OF SOLEDAD, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 36 Defendants.

13 Plaintiff Martin Guapo-Villegas brings this action against defendants the City of Soledad (“City”) and Officers Alejandro Castillo and Mustafa Yasin. Dkt. No. 1. On September 4, 2024, the Court granted defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint but gave Mr. Villegas2 leave to amend. Dkt. No. 33. Mr. Villegas filed an amended complaint on October 4, 2024, reasserting violations of his civil rights under federal and state law. Dkt. No. 35. Defendants moved to dismiss the claims once more under Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for failure to state a claim and moved to strike Mr. Villegas’s request for punitive damages under Rule 12(f). Dkt. No. 36. Mr. Villegas opposed the motion. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.