Hoang Le v. Mulroses USA, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaApril 18, 20255:25-cv-00599California325 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES—

GENERAL

Case No. 5:25-cv-00599-SSS-DTBx Date April 18, 2025 Title Hoang Le v. Mulroses USA, Inc.

Present: The Honorable SUNSHINE S. SYKES, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Irene Vazquez Not Reported Deputy Clerk Court Reporter

Attorney(s) Present for Plaintiff(s): Attorney(s) Present for Defendant(s): None Present None Present

Proceedings: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

REGARDING REPRESENTATION OF CORPORATE

DEFENDANT

On March 26, 2025, Defendant Mulroses USA, Inc. (“Mulroses”) filed an Answer seemingly on behalf of itself. [See Dkt. 13]. However, corporations and other business entities cannot appear pro se in federal court. See Rowland v. Cal. Men’s Colony, 506 U.S. 194, 201-02 (1993) (“It has been the law for the better part of two centuries . . . that a corporation may appear in the federal courts only through licensed counsel.”); Dr. JKL Ltd. v. HPC IT Educ. Ctr., 749 F. Supp. 2d 1038, 1046 (N.D. Cal. 2010) (“A corporation or other artificial entity must be represented by licensed counsel.”); see also C.D.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.