John Roe DR 63 v. Doe 1
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaApril 18, 20255:24-cv-02509California542 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
J S -
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8 Case No.: 5:24-cv-02509-MRA-SHK JOHN ROE DR 63,
Plaintiff/s,
O RDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S
v.
MOTION TO REMAND [ECF 8] AND
STAYING ACTION PENDING FINAL
SETTLEMENT AND FILING OF
DOE 1, et al.,
DISMISSAL, REMOVING CASE
Defendant/s. FROM ACTIVE CASELOAD
17 18 The Parties in the above-entitled case have advised the Court that they are 19 finalizing the terms of a global settlement (Dkt. 39, Stipulation to Stay Case pending 21 Settlement) and therefore seek an order staying all proceedings in the case. There is a 22 pending Motion to Remand filed by Plaintiff on December 19, 2024. ECF 8. 24 Defendants oppose the Motion. ECF 12. The sole issue presented in the Motion is 25 whether the parties are completely diverse for purposes of establishing diversity 26 jurisdiction. The amount in controversy is not in dispute. Complete diversity exists 28 when “each…