John Roe DR 63 v. Doe 1

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaApril 18, 20255:24-cv-02509California542 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

J S -

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

8 Case No.: 5:24-cv-02509-MRA-SHK JOHN ROE DR 63,

Plaintiff/s,

O RDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

v.

MOTION TO REMAND [ECF 8] AND

STAYING ACTION PENDING FINAL

SETTLEMENT AND FILING OF

DOE 1, et al.,

DISMISSAL, REMOVING CASE

Defendant/s. FROM ACTIVE CASELOAD

17 18 The Parties in the above-entitled case have advised the Court that they are 19 finalizing the terms of a global settlement (Dkt. 39, Stipulation to Stay Case pending 21 Settlement) and therefore seek an order staying all proceedings in the case. There is a 22 pending Motion to Remand filed by Plaintiff on December 19, 2024. ECF 8. 24 Defendants oppose the Motion. ECF 12. The sole issue presented in the Motion is 25 whether the parties are completely diverse for purposes of establishing diversity 26 jurisdiction. The amount in controversy is not in dispute. Complete diversity exists 28 when “each…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.