Abdulgader

(PC) Wolinski v. Abdulgader

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 18, 20252:21-cv-02078California3,029 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KRZYSZTOF F. WOLINSKI, No. 2:21-cv-2078-DJC-CKD P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND ABDULBASET ABDULGADER, et al., FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Krzysztof Wolinski, a state prisoner, filed this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, and the matter was referred to the undersigned by Local Rule 302. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). In the motion presently before the court, defendants move for dismissal of the case based on plaintiff’s failure to comply with court orders to respond to discovery requests. (ECF No. 69.) Defendants also request their attorney fees. For the reasons set forth below, the undersigned recommends that defendants’ motion be granted as to the request for terminating sanctions. Plaintiff’s motion for an extension of time to file a response to the court’s January 29, 2025, order is also before the court (ECF No. 74.) Plaintiff has filed his response, labeled as objections. (ECF No. 75.) To the extent plaintiff…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.