Jason L. Comstock v. Martin O'Malley

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMarch 21, 20252:24-cv-01481California1,709 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

I.

INTRODUCTION

This Corrected Report and Recommendation is submitted to the Honorable Valerie Baker Fairbank, United States Senior District Judge, under 28 U.S.C. § 636 and General Order 05-07 of the United States District Court for the Central District of California. Plaintiff Jason L. Comstock seeks review of the Commissioner’s final decision denying his application for disability insurance benefits. (ECF 1). Among other claims, Plaintiff contends that the administrative law judge (“ALJ”) failed to give sufficient reasons to reject plaintiff’s subjective symptom testimony about his mental

1 Leland Dudek, the current Commissioner, is substituted as Defendant for former Acting Commissioner Martin O’Malley. 42 U.S.C. § 405(g); Fed. R. Civ. P. 25(d).

2 This Corrected Report and Recommendation is issued solely to correct minor typographical errors; no material substantive changes have been made. Thus, its filing does not trigger another period for objections or extend the one that lapsed on March 20, impairments. (ECF 9 at 17–19). For the reasons below, the Commissioner's decision should be reversed, and this matter remanded for further…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.