Michelle

(PC) James v. Michelle

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 18, 20252:24-cv-01770California1,236 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RONALD EUGENE JAMES, Case No. 2:24-cv-1770-DAD-JDP (P) Plaintiff, v. ORDER; FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

MICHELLE, et al., Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, a former inmate in the Sacramento County Jail, brings this action against defendant Michelle, a nurse at the jail, and an unknown physician. ECF No. 14 at 2. He alleges that these defendants violated his Fourteenth Amendment right as a pretrial detainee to adequate medical care. I find that, liberally construed, plaintiff states a viable claim against defendant Michelle, but not against the unnamed physician. Screening Order I. Screening and Pleading Requirements A federal court must screen the complaint of any claimant seeking permission to proceed in forma pauperis. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e). The court must identify any cognizable claims and dismiss any portion of the complaint that is frivolous or malicious, fails to state a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.