(PS) Warfield v. California Highway Patrol

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BRODERICK WARFIELD, Case No. 2:24-cv-02886-DJC-CSK Plaintiff, v. ORDER ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTIONS CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL (ECF Nos. 19-23, 26-27, 35-44) GOLDEN GATE DIVISION, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Broderick Warfield, who is proceeding pro se, has filed seventeen (17) miscellaneous motions that are currently pending before the Court. (ECF Nos. 19-23, 26- 27, 35-44.) Pursuant to E.D. Cal. Local Rule 230(g), the motions are submitted upon the record and the briefs. For the reasons that follow, the Court DENIES Plaintiff’s motions. The Court rules on the motions as follows: 1. Plaintiff has filed multiple requests to seal documents. (ECF Nos. 19-23, 26, 35, 37-38, 40-42, 44.) These requests are denied because there are no motions pending before the Court that require the Court to review these documents. The motions are also not signed personally by Plaintiff as required. See Fed. R. Civ. P.…