Gallo

Gallo v. Lantheus Medical Imaging, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 18, 20252:24-cv-03391California3,248 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PETER GALLO,

Plaintiff, No. 2:24-cv-03391-TLN-SCR

13 v. ORDER

LANTHEUS MEDICAL IMAGING, INC.,

15 Defendant.

17 This matter is before the Court on Defendant Lantheus Medical Imaging, Inc.’s (“Defendant”) Motion to Dismiss. (ECF No. 6.) Plaintiff Peter Gallo (“Plaintiff”) filed an opposition. (ECF No. 7.) Defendant filed a reply. (ECF No. 10.) For the reasons set forth below, Defendant’s motion is GRANTED. /// /// /// /// /// /// 28 I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND The instant action arises out of Defendant’s alleged violation of the California Fair Employment and Housing Act (“FEHA”) for its failure to accommodate Plaintiff’s religion by refusing to grant him an exemption from the COVID-19 vaccination requirement and terminating his employment. (See ECF No. 1-2 at 8–13.) Plaintiff started working for Defendant around November 29, 2010 as a Senior Cardiovascular Imaging Specialist, performed his job well 7…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.