CDCR

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 EUGENE ALLEN DAVIS, JR., Case No. 2:25-cv-0389-JDP (P) Plaintiff, v. ORDER CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF

CORRECTIONS & REHABILITATION,

et al., Defendants. 17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this § 1983 action against the State of California, the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (“CDCR”), his mental health treatment team, and CDCR Administration. ECF No. 1. The allegations fail to state a claim. Plaintiff may, if he chooses, file an amended complaint that addresses the deficiencies noted herein. I will grant plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis. ECF No. 2. Screening and Pleading Requirements A federal court must screen the complaint of any claimant seeking permission to proceed in forma pauperis. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e). The court must identify any cognizable claims and dismiss any portion of the complaint that is frivolous or malicious, fails…