Pesce

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ICHI WU, Case No. 2:25-cv-0760-TLN-JDP Plaintiff, v. ORDER JAMIE PESCE, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff proceeds in this civil action without counsel. Accordingly, the matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 302. On March 13, 2025, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff filed objections, and they were considered by the undersigned. The Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Robbins v. Carey, 481 F.3d 1143, 1147 (9th Cir. 2007) (“[D]eterminations of law by the magistrate judge are reviewed de novo by both the district court and [the…