Brandon Briskin v. Shopify, Inc.

Good Law
135 F.4th 739
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 21, 202522-15815California20,112 words

Opinion

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

BRANDON BRISKIN, on behalf of No. 22-15815 himself and those similarly situated, D.C. No. 4:21-cv- Plaintiff-Appellant, 06269-PJH

v.

OPINION

SHOPIFY, INC.; SHOPIFY (USA),

INC.; SHOPIFY PAYMENTS (USA),

INC.,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Phyllis J. Hamilton, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted En Banc September 26, 2024 San Francisco, California

Filed April 21, 2025

Before: Mary H. Murguia, Chief Judge, and Kim McLane Wardlaw, Johnnie B. Rawlinson, Consuelo M. Callahan, Morgan Christen, Michelle T. Friedland, Mark J. Bennett, Daniel P. Collins, Patrick J. Bumatay, Holly A. Thomas and Roopali H. Desai, Circuit Judges. BRISKIN V. SHOPIFY, INC.

Opinion by Judge Wardlaw; Concurrence by Judge Collins; Concurrence by Judge Bumatay; Dissent by Judge Callahan

SUMMARY *

Personal Jurisdiction

The en banc court reversed the district court’s dismissal for lack of personal jurisdiction, and applying traditional specific personal jurisdiction precedent to e-commerce, concluded…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.