Caixia Du v. Pamela Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 22, 202516-72021California923 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 22 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

CAIXIA DU, No. 16-72021

Petitioner, Agency No. A089-889-520

v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA J. BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted April 21, 2025** San Francisco, California

Before: WARDLAW and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges, and ROSENTHAL,*** District Judge.

Caixia Du, a native and citizen of China, petitions for review of a decision of

the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) dismissing an appeal from an order of

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Lee H. Rosenthal, United States District Judge for the Southern District of Texas, sitting by designation. an Immigration Judge (“IJ”) denying asylum, withholding of removal, and

protection…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.