United States v. Michael Cottrell

Good Law
539 F. App'x 727
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 21, 201311-30332, 12-30103, 12-30227California173 words

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

In these consolidated appeals, Michael Thomas Cottrell appeals from the district court’s orders revoking supervised release and the sentences imposed upon revocation. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 , 87 S.Ct. 1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Cottrell’s counsel has filed briefs stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with motions to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Cottrell the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

A review of the record indicates that these appeals are moot because Cottrell has completed his custodial sentences and he is no longer serving a term of supervised release. See Spencer v. Kemna, 523 U.S. 1, 13-14 , 118 S.Ct. 978 , 140 L.Ed.2d 43 (1998); United States v. Palomba, 182 F.3d 1121, 1123 (9th Cir.1999). We accordingly dismiss these appeals.

Counsel’s motions to withdraw are GRANTED.

DISMISSED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.