Rivera-Galeano

Rivera-Galeano v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 22, 202522-1828California1,310 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 22 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

EDGAR ENRIQUE RIVERA-GALEANO, No. 22-1828 Agency No. Petitioner, A088-173-405 v.

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General, MEMORANDUM*

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted April 18, 2025** San Francisco, California

Before: CLIFTON, H.A. THOMAS, and DESAI, Circuit Judges. Partial Dissent by Judge DESAI.

Edgar Enrique Rivera-Galeano petitions for review of an order from the

Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) affirming a decision by an Immigration

Judge (“IJ”) denying his requests for withholding of removal and protection under

the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). § 1252. We deny the petition.

“Where, as…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.