Bondi

Padilla Ochoa v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 22, 202524-1005California844 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 22 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

EDWIN ALEXANDER PADILLA No. 24-1005 OCHOA; ERIKA FAVIOLA BERMUDEZ Agency Nos.

CRUZ; KENDALL MAYBETH PADILLA A220-489-947

BERMUDEZ; KRISTEN ZARIAH A220-489-948

PADILLA BERMUDEZ,

A220-489-949

A220-489-950

Petitioners,

v. MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted April 7, 2025** Pasadena, California

Before: CALLAHAN, DESAI, and DE ALBA, Circuit Judges.

Edwin Padilla Ochoa, his wife, and two daughters (collectively,

“Petitioners”) appeal the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“Board”) order denying

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

1 their motion to reopen and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.