McNeely

McNeely v. Loeschner

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 22, 202524-3601California636 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 22 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DAVID MCNEELY, No. 24-3601 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellant, 3:23-cv-00587-LRH-CLB v.

MEMORANDUM*

PETER LOESCHNER; CHRIS

CRAWFORTH; KEVIN L. DACH; CITY

OF SPARKS,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Larry R. Hicks, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted April 4, 2025** Phoenix, Arizona

Before: HAWKINS, WALLACH***, and R. NELSON, Circuit Judges.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Evan J. Wallach, United States Circuit Judge for the Federal Circuit, sitting by designation. David McNeely (“McNeely”) appeals from the district court’s dismissal under

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) of his six causes of action against the City

of Sparks, Nevada; Peter…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.