Ronan Telephone Co. v. Federal Communications Commission

Good Law
539 F. App'x 722
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 21, 201305-71995California457 words

Opinion

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

Ronan Telephone Company and Hot Springs Telephone Company petition this court to review the FCC’s February 24, 2005 Declaratory Ruling and Report and Order (the “Order”). We grant the petition and remand.

1. The Telecommunications Act of 1996 (“TCA”) ended local telephone service monopolies and permitted telephone companies “for the first time to compete with each other for local telephone customers.” AT & T Commc’ns of Cal., Inc. v. Pac-West Telecomm, Inc., 651 F.3d 980, 982 (9th Cir.2011). For regulatory purposes, the TCA divided local telephone companies into two groups: incumbent local exchange carriers (“ILECs”), the pre-TCA monopoly actors, and competitive local exchange carriers (“CLECs”), the post-TCA market entrants. Id.

2. The TCA opened local telephone markets to the new entrants and encouraged competition among ILECs and CLECs through a system that imposed “special obligations on ILECs to mitigate their dominant market position.” Pac-West, 651 F.3d at 983 ; Verizon Md., Inc. v. Pub. Serv. Comm’n, 535 U.S. 635, 638 , 122 S.Ct. 1753 , 152 L.Ed.2d 871 (2002). However, Congress also included exceptions directed toward rural communities. Thus, many ILECs could…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.