David Walden v. Gregory Akers

Good Law
539 F. App'x 737·539 Fed. Appx. 737·2013 WL 4451114·2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 17524
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 21, 201312-55251California343 words

Opinion

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

David K. Walden appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment affirming the bankruptcy court’s summary judgment in favor of Chapter 7 trustee Gregory A. Akers. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 158 (d). We review de novo the district court’s decision on an appeal from a bankruptcy court and apply the same de novo standard of review used by the district court to review the bankruptcy court’s summary judgment. Suncrest Healthcare Ctr. LLC v. Omega Healthcare Investors, Inc. (In re Raintree Healthcare Corp.), 431 F.3d 685, 687 (9th Cir.2005). We affirm.

The bankruptcy court properly granted summary judgment because Walden failed to raise a genuine dispute of material fact as to whether the debtor was insolvent when he made payments to Walden. See 11 U.S.C. § 547 (b) (elements of a preferences claim); Arrow Elecs., Inc. v. Justus (In re Kaypro), 218 F.3d 1070, 1076 (9th Cir.2000) (discussing the insolvency requirement under 11 U.S.C. § 547 (b)); see also Rivera v. Nat’l R.R. Passenger Corp., 331 F.3d 1074, 1078 (9th Cir.2003) (“Con-clusory allegations unsupported by factual data cannot defeat summary judgment.”). Walden also failed to raise a genuine dispute of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.