Oscar
Oscar v. Bondi
Opinion
Opinion
Ikuta, J.
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
MARIS OSCAR, No. 23-3858 Agency No. Petitioner,
A220-509-072
v.
OPINION
PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted December 4, 2024 * Pasadena, California
Filed April 23, 2025
Before: Jay S. Bybee, Sandra S. Ikuta, and Bridget S. Bade, Circuit Judges.
Opinion by Judge Ikuta
* The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). SUMMARY **
Immigration
The panel denied Maris Oscar’s petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ decision upholding the determination that he was ineligible for asylum under the firm resettlement doctrine. Applying Maharaj v. Gonzales, 450 F.3d 961, 967 (9th Cir. 2006) (en banc), the panel reviewed the agency’s finding of firm resettlement for substantial evidence, noting that Maharaj’s standard of review comported with the Supreme Court’s instruction in Wilkinson v. Garland, 601 U.S. 209 (2024) to review such mixed questions with deference. The panel…