Oscar

Oscar v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 23, 202523-3858California605 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

APR 23 2025

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MARIS OSCAR, No. 23-3858

Petitioner, Agency No.

A220-509-072

v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted December 4, 2024** Pasadena, California

Before: BYBEE, IKUTA, and BADE, Circuit Judges.

Maris Oscar petitions for review of the decision of the Board of Immigration

Appeals (BIA) dismissing his appeal of an order of the immigration judge (IJ)

denying his application for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Convention Against Torture (CAT).1 We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252,

and we deny the petition.

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s adverse credibility finding. Zhi

v.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.