National Abortion Federation v. Center for Medical Progress

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 23, 202521-16983California569 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

APR 23 2025

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

NATIONAL ABORTION FEDERATION, Nos. 21-16983, 22-15102, 24-1948

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 3:15-cv-03522-WHO

v.

MEMORANDUM*

CENTER FOR MEDICAL PROGRESS,

ET AL.,

Defendants-Appellants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California William H. Orrick, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted April 21, 2025

Before: S.R. THOMAS, MCKEOWN, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.

The Center for Medical Progress (“CMP”), Biomax Procurement Services,

LLC, and David Daleiden (collectively “Defendants”) and Steven Cooley and

Brentford Ferreira (collectively “Contemnors”) challenge the district court’s order

awarding both trial-level and appellate-level attorney’s fees (22-15102) and costs

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. (21-16983). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for

abuse of discretion the district court’s ruling on attorney’s fees and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.