Musgrove

Musgrove v. Hanifin

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 23, 202523-3922California444 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 23 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

IRVIN MUSGROVE, No. 23-3922 D.C. No. 3:20-cv-00614-JO-BLM Plaintiff - Appellant,

v. MEMORANDUM*

ANGIE HANIFIN; OCEANSIDE

HOUSING AUTHORITY; MARGERY

PIERCE; KEYSA MACHADO; SUSANA

SANDOVAL-SOTO,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California Jinsook Ohta, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted April 22, 2025**

Before: GRABER, H.A. THOMAS, and JOHNSTONE, Circuit Judges.

Irvin Musgrove appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing

his action alleging housing rights violations under federal and state laws. We have

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for an abuse of discretion.

Applied…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.