Mitchell v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 23, 202523-3811California349 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 23 2025
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
RONALD MITCHELL, No. 23-3811 D.C. No. 2:22-cv-02232-DJC-CKD Plaintiff - Appellant,
v. MEMORANDUM*
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF
CORRECTIONS AND
REHABILITATION; J. BENEVIDAZ,
Warden; PATRICK COVELLO, Warden; HABENDANK SACKETT, Custodial Officer; HABEDANK, Custodial Officer; PATTERSON, Custodial Officer; MULE CREEK STATE
PRISON; FEDEX
CORPORATION; CALIFORNIA
MEDICAL FACILITY,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Daniel J. Calabretta, District Court, Presiding
Submitted April 22, 2025**
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Before: GRABER, H.A. THOMAS, and JOHNSTONE, Circuit Judges.