Mitchell v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 23, 202523-3811California349 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 23 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

RONALD MITCHELL, No. 23-3811 D.C. No. 2:22-cv-02232-DJC-CKD Plaintiff - Appellant,

v. MEMORANDUM*

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF

CORRECTIONS AND

REHABILITATION; J. BENEVIDAZ,

Warden; PATRICK COVELLO, Warden; HABENDANK SACKETT, Custodial Officer; HABEDANK, Custodial Officer; PATTERSON, Custodial Officer; MULE CREEK STATE

PRISON; FEDEX

CORPORATION; CALIFORNIA

MEDICAL FACILITY,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Daniel J. Calabretta, District Court, Presiding

Submitted April 22, 2025**

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Before: GRABER, H.A. THOMAS, and JOHNSTONE, Circuit Judges.

California state prisoner Ronald Mitchell appeals pro se…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.