People v. Bristow CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 23, 2025C101275MCalifornia1,911 words

Opinion

Opinion

Mauro, J.

Filed 4/23/25 P. v. Bristow CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Yolo) ----

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent, C101275

v. (Super. Ct. No. CR201322792)

DAVID EARL BRISTOW, ORDER MODIFYING

OPINION AND DENYING

Defendant and Appellant. REHEARING

[NO CHANGE IN

JUDGMENT]

THE COURT:

It is ordered that the opinion filed in this case on April 9, 2025, be modified as follows:

On page 2, first full paragraph, delete the second sentence and replace with: “Applying the presumption of correctness to this case, we discern no error. To the extent defendant contends the trial court might have misunderstood…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.