eGumball

eGumball v. Merrick Bank Corp. CA4/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 23, 2025G062863California5,246 words

Opinion

Opinion

Motoike, J.

Filed 4/23/25 eGumball v. Merrick Bank Corp. CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

EGUMBALL, INC.,

Plaintiff and Respondent, G062863

v. (Super. Ct. No. 30-2021- 01216871)

MERRICK BANK CORPORATION,

OPINION

Defendant and Appellant.

Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of Orange County, Sandy N. Leal, Judge. Affirmed. Appellant’s motion to seal. Granted without prejudice. Respondent’s motion to seal. Granted in part without prejudice and denied in part. Duane Morris, Paul J. Killion, Michelle N. Khoury, Daniel G. Gurfein and James J. Regan for Defendant and Appellant. Miller Barondess, Nadia A. Sarkis, Eleanor S. Ruth; Waymaker, Scott M. Malzahn, Sam Meehan; Samini Baric and Babak (Bobby)…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.