Cathy
Cathy v. Palma
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CHARLES RAY CATHY, Case No.: 22cv1565-LL-JLB
Plaintiff,
ORDER:
v. (1) GRANTING DEFENDANTS’
MOTION TO ENFORCE
PALMA, et al.,
SETTLEMENT
Defendants. [ECF No. 73];
16 (2) DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO RECONSIDER
SETTLEMENT
18 [ECF No. 76] 19 Before the Court is Defendants’ Motion to Enforce Settlement (“Motion”). ECF No. 73 (“Mot.”). Specifically, Defendants “move the Court for an order enforcing the parties’ settlement agreement entered into on the record on August 27, 2024, and dismissing Plaintiff’s Complaint & Supplemental Complaint, and all claims as to all Defendants, with prejudice.” Id. at 2. Plaintiff filed a document styled “Motion to Reconsider Mediation Hearing Settlement,” which the Court construes as an opposition to Defendants’ Motion. ECF No. 76 (“Opposition” or “Oppo.”). Finally, Defendants filed a Reply. ECF No. 77 (“Reply”). The Court…