Cathy

Cathy v. Palma

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaApril 21, 20253:22-cv-01565California1,266 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CHARLES RAY CATHY, Case No.: 22cv1565-LL-JLB

Plaintiff,

ORDER:

v. (1) GRANTING DEFENDANTS’

MOTION TO ENFORCE

PALMA, et al.,

SETTLEMENT

Defendants. [ECF No. 73];

16 (2) DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO RECONSIDER

SETTLEMENT

18 [ECF No. 76] 19 Before the Court is Defendants’ Motion to Enforce Settlement (“Motion”). ECF No. 73 (“Mot.”). Specifically, Defendants “move the Court for an order enforcing the parties’ settlement agreement entered into on the record on August 27, 2024, and dismissing Plaintiff’s Complaint & Supplemental Complaint, and all claims as to all Defendants, with prejudice.” Id. at 2. Plaintiff filed a document styled “Motion to Reconsider Mediation Hearing Settlement,” which the Court construes as an opposition to Defendants’ Motion. ECF No. 76 (“Opposition” or “Oppo.”). Finally, Defendants filed a Reply. ECF No. 77 (“Reply”). The Court…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.