Clarisol Mejia v. Credence Management Solutions

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaApril 21, 20252:23-cv-02028California4,064 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

O 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Case No.: 2:23-cv-02028-MEMF-MRW CLARISOL MEJIA,

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS [ECF

v. NO. 47]

CREDENCE MANAGEMENT SOLUTIONS,

UNITEDHEALTHCARE INSURANCE COMPANY and DOES 1- 10, 16 Defendants.

18 19 Before the Court is Defendants’ Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. ECF No. 47. Defendants also filed a Request for Judicial Notice. ECF No. 48. For the reasons stated herein, the Court hereby GRANTS the Request for Judicial Notice and DENIES the Motion. 23 24 25 26 / / / / / / BACKGROUND I. Factual Allegations1 Plaintiff Clarisol Mejia (“Mejia”) is a resident of California. FAC ¶ 6. Defendant Credence Management Solutions (“Credence”) does business in California. Id. ¶ 1. Defendant UnitedHealthcare Insurance, Co. (“UHS”; together with Credence, “Defendants”) is the administrator and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.