Fernandez
Fernandez v. Duarte
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaApril 22, 20253:22-cv-00446California2,273 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9 FRANK J. FERNANDEZ, Case No. 22-cv-0446-BAS-VET 10 Plaintiff,
ORDER:
11 v. 1. OVERRULING PLAINTIFF’S
E. DUARTE, ISU Sergeant, OBJECTIONS (ECF NO. 104),
13 Defendant. 2. CONFIRMING ADOPTION OF
REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATION IN ITS ENTIRETY (ECF No. 92), 16 3. CONSTRUING MOTION AND
GRANTING MOTION FOR
EXTENSION (ECF No. 122),
AND
19 4. DENYING MOTION FOR
RECONSIDERATION
(ECF No. 116)
22 The plaintiff, Frank J. Fernandez (“Plaintiff”) is incarcerated and representing himself in the case (also called “proceeding pro se”). During discovery and without leave of the Court, the defendant took Plaintiff’s deposition. However, the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure require a party to obtain leave of court if the subject of a deposition “is confined in prison,” as Plaintiff presently is. Fed. R. Civ. P. (“Rule”) 30(a)(2)(B). After Plaintiff 28 …