Fernandez

Fernandez v. Duarte

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaApril 22, 20253:22-cv-00446California2,273 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9 FRANK J. FERNANDEZ, Case No. 22-cv-0446-BAS-VET 10 Plaintiff,

ORDER:

11 v. 1. OVERRULING PLAINTIFF’S

E. DUARTE, ISU Sergeant, OBJECTIONS (ECF NO. 104),

13 Defendant. 2. CONFIRMING ADOPTION OF

REPORT AND

RECOMMENDATION IN ITS ENTIRETY (ECF No. 92), 16 3. CONSTRUING MOTION AND

GRANTING MOTION FOR

EXTENSION (ECF No. 122),

AND

19 4. DENYING MOTION FOR

RECONSIDERATION

(ECF No. 116)

22 The plaintiff, Frank J. Fernandez (“Plaintiff”) is incarcerated and representing himself in the case (also called “proceeding pro se”). During discovery and without leave of the Court, the defendant took Plaintiff’s deposition. However, the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure require a party to obtain leave of court if the subject of a deposition “is confined in prison,” as Plaintiff presently is. Fed. R. Civ. P. (“Rule”) 30(a)(2)(B). After Plaintiff 28 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.