Ricolcol
Susan Andrea Cavadas v. Ricolcol
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SUSAN A. CAVADAS, Case No. CV 24-9193 AH (KES)
Petitioner
ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT
v. AND RECOMMENDATION OF
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE
WARDEN RICOLCOL, JUDGE Respondent.
16 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition (Dkt. 1), the operative First Amended Petition (Dkt. 7; “FAP”), the Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. 14; “Motion”); Petitioner’s Response to the Motion (Dkt. 16; “Response”), the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge (Dkt. 17; “Report”), Petitioner’s Objections to the Report (Dkt. 19; “Objections”), and the other relevant records on file. The Court has engaged in a de novo review. Although not required, the Court briefly discusses the following points. See United States v. Ramos, 65 F.4th 427, 434 (9th Cir. 2023) (“the district court ha[s] no obligation to provide individualized analysis of each objection”); Wang v. Masaitis, 416 F.3d 992, 1000 (9th…