Estate of Jane Roe DM 101 v. Doe 1
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 Case No.: 24-cv-2344-DMS-JLB ESTATE OF JANE ROE DM 101,
Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ v. MOTION TO DISMISS DOE 1; et al., 13 Defendants. 14 15
17 Pending before the Court is Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint. (Defendants’ Motion (“Defs.’ Mot.”), ECF No. 27). Plaintiff filed an Opposition, (Plaintiff’s Opposition (“Opp’n”), ECF No. 29), and Defendants filed a Reply, (Defendants’ Reply (“Reply”), ECF No. 30). For the following reasons, the Court DENIES Defendants’ Motion. I. BACKGROUND On August 26, 2024, Plaintiff Estate of Jane Roe DM 101 filed this action in San Diego County Superior Court (“Superior Court”). (Plaintiff’s Complaint (“Compl.”), ECF No. 1). Plaintiff alleges that over a period of nine years, between 1961 and 1970, Jane Roe experienced sexual, physical, and psychological abuse from religious authorities affiliated…