Raul Gonzales v. Ford Motor Company
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10 RAUL GONZALES, Case No. 2:25-cv-00523-WLH-JPR 11 Plaintiff, ORDER RE PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO REMAND [14] v.
FORD MOTOR CO., et al.
Defendants.
Before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion to Remand (the “Motion”). (Mot. to
Remand (“Mot.”), Docket No. 14). No party filed a written request for oral argument stating that an attorney with five years or less of experience would be arguing the matter. (See Standing Order, Docket No. 7 at 16). Further, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 78 and Local Rule 7-15, the Court finds this matter appropriate for decision without oral argument. The hearing calendared for May 2, 2025, is VACATED, and the matter taken off calendar. For the reasons explained herein, the Court DENIES the Motion. /// /// /// I. BACKGROUND A. Factual Background Plaintiff Raul Gonzales (“Plaintiff” or “Plaintiff Gonzales”) brings the present action against…