EcoHub, LLC v. Recology Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 23, 20253:22-cv-09181California8,280 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

facts (ECF Nos. 87-1; 87-2), Plaintiff’s opposition to Nortech’s motion (ECF No. 94-2), Plaintiff’s 25 opposition to Recology’s motion (ECF No. 97-1), and the parties’ declarations and exhibits in support of their respective motions, which were filed under seal. Most sections of these 26 documents cited within this order can be found in redacted versions the parties filed on the public docket. See ECF Nos. 85 (Nortech’s redacted Mot. for Summ. J.); 88 (Recology’s redacted Mot. 27 for Summ. J.); 96 (Plaintiff’s redacted opposition to Nortech’s motion); 98 (Plaintiff’s redacted II. BACKGROUND Plaintiff EcoHub is a Texas limited liability company founded and operated by George Gitschel. Third Am. Compl. (“TAC”) ¶ 10, ECF No. 41, Pl.’s Resp. to Recology’s Separate Statement of Material Facts (“SSMF”), Fact No. 1. Defendant Recology is a California corporation based in San Francisco, CA (Pl.’s Resp. to Recology SSMF, Fact No. 12), and Defendant Nortech is a California limited liability company based in Nevada City, CA. TAC ¶ 12. Recology is one of three members of Nortech, each of which is a 33.3% minority owner with …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.