(PC) McCloud v. Solano County Sheriff Dept.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 21, 20252:24-cv-00687California612 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RICKY JAY MCCLOUD, No. 2:24-cv-00687-DAD-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, v. ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS AND DISMISSING

SOLANO COUNTY SHERIFF CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEFENDANTS DEPARTMENT, et al., (Doc. No. 11) Defendants.

17 Plaintiff Ricky Jay McCloud is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On December 20, 2024, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations recommending that plaintiff’s claims in his first amended complaint against defendants Solano County Sheriff’s Department and Smyth be dismissed for failure to state a cognizable claim. (Doc. No. 11 at 4.) Specifically, the assigned magistrate judge found that plaintiff had not alleged a custom or policy of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.