Flick
Flick v. PowerSchool Holdings, Inc.
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL FI LED
:
MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION
CLERK, U.S. DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
BY sf JulieOlsen DEPUTY
IN RE: POWERSCHOOL HOLDINGS, INC.,
AND POWERSCHOOL GROUP, LLC CUSTOMER
DATA SECURITY BREACH LITIGATION MDL No. 3149
TRANSFER ORDER
Before the Panel:* Plaintiffs in the Western District of Missouri J.J. action listed on Schedule A move under 28 U.S.C. § 1407 to centralize this litigation in the Western District of Missouri. This litigation consists of 32 actions pending in three districts, as listed on Schedule A. In addition, the parties have informed the Panel of 23 related actions pending in eight districts. ! Most responding parties support centralization. Defendants PowerSchool Holdings, Inc., and PowerSchool Group LLC (collectively “PowerSchool”), and the responding plaintiffs □□ all but six cases support or do not oppose centralization.” There is less agreement on selection of the transferee district. PowerSchool requests centralization in the Eastern District of California or the Northern District of California. Plaintiffs in more than 30 actions likewise support…