Cueva
(PC) Carr v. Cueva
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 PAUL DAVID CARR, No. 2:24-cv-1680 DJC AC P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 CUEVA, et al, 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is a state inmate who filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 18 without a lawyer. He has been granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis. ECF No. 12. 19 In screening the original complaint, the undersigned gave plaintiff the option to proceed 20 on his cognizable claim against defendant Dr. Dail or amend the complaint. ECF No. 12 at 3-5. 21 Plaintiff elected to amend the complaint, ECF No. 17, and has since filed two amended 22 complaints. ECF Nos. 28, 31.1 The court now screens the Second Amended Complaint, ECF No. 23 31. 24 //// 25
26 1 According to plaintiff, the two amended complaints are the same except for the removal of one defendant in the second amended complaint. See ECF No. 28 at 4, 15, 16; ECF No. 31 at 4, 15, 27 16; ECF No. 32 at 2. Although plaintiff refers to both amended complaints as FACs, for…