Hernandez

Hernandez v. Saul

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaApril 23, 20253:21-cv-00225California381 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RAMON H., Case No.: 21-cv-0225-SBC

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING WITHOUT v. PREJUDICE JOINT MOTION FOR

ATTORNEY’S FEES AND

LELAND DUDEK, Acting Commissioner EXPENSES PURSUANT TO THE of Social Security,

EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT,

Defendant. 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d) AND COSTS PURSUANT TO 19 U.S.C. § 1920 [ECF NO. 29] 17 18 Presently before the Court is the parties’ second joint motion for the award of attorney’s fees and expenses pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d) (“EAJA”) and costs pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1920. (ECF No. 29.) Under the EAJA, the prevailing party must file an application for fees, expenses, and costs within thirty days of a final judgment. 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)(1)(B). The thirty-day filing period does not begin to run until after the sixty-day appeal period in Fed. R. Civ. P.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.