Moreno

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CHARLES A. DANIELS, Case No.: 22-CV-1263-JO-KSC

Plaintiff,

ORDER PROVIDING NOTICE

vs. TO PRO SE PRISONER OF

REQUIREMENTS FOR OPPOSING

A. MORENO, et al.,

SUMMARY JUDGMENT

PURSUANT TO Defendants. KLINGELE / RAND

17 This notice is required to be given to Plaintiff pursuant to Rand v. Rowland, 154 F.3d 952 (9th Cir. 1998) (en banc) and Klingele v. Eikenberry, 849 F.2d 409 (9th Cir. 1988):1 Defendants Lechuga and Moreno filed a Motion for Summary Judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56. Doc. No. 66. Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment will, if granted, end your case. Rule 56 tells you what you must do to oppose a Motion for Summary Judgment. Generally, summary judgment must be granted when there

26 Klingele and Rand together require the district court “as a bare minimum,” to ensure that a pro se prisoner has “fair notice of the requirements of the summary…