Applied Optoelectronics, Inc. v. Accelight Technologies, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 APPLIED OPTOELECTRONICS, INC., Case No. 24-cv-09041-HSG
Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT ACCELIGHT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.'S v. MOTION TO DISMISS
ACCELIGHT TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Re: Dkt. No. 24 Defendant.
12 Pending before the Court is Defendant Accelight Technologies, Inc.’s (“Defendant”) motion to dismiss Plaintiff Applied Optoelectronics, Inc.’s (“Plaintiff’) first amended complaint (“FAC”). Dkt. No. 24 (“Mot.”). The Court finds this matter appropriate for disposition without oral argument and takes it under submission. See Civil L.R. 7-1(b). For the following reasons, the Court DENIES Defendant’s motion. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff filed this case on December 13, 2024. Dkt. No. 1. Defendant moved to dismiss Plaintiff’s complaint on February 6, 2025, and Plaintiff subsequently filed its FAC on February 19, 2025. Dkt. No. 21 (“FAC”). The FAC accuses Defendant of infringing U.S. Patent Nos. 9,523,826 (the…