Viljoen
Tammy Taylor Nails, Inc. v. Viljoen
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
I 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 || TAMMY TAYLOR NAILS, INC., Case No. 24-cv-0624-BAS-DTF Plaintft, ORDER AMENDING REQUEST V. FOR SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING || MELANY VILJOEN, PEET VILJOEN, (ECE No. 21)
B TAMMY TAYLOR GLOBAL
FRANCHISING, and DOES 1 || THROUGH 10, Defendants. 16 Last week, this Court issued an Order Requesting Supplemental Briefing regarding ||service of process and specific jurisdiction. Yesterday, an en banc panel of the Ninth 19 || Circuit issued a decision in Briskin v. Shopify, Inc., No. 22-15815, 2025 WL 1154075 (9th 20 || Cir. Apr. 21, 2025), which deals with issues of specific jurisdiction. Accordingly, this Court ||} AMENDS its prior Order and requests Plaintiff, to the degree Plaintiff believes Shopify applies, to address Shopify in its supplemental briefing. (ECF No. 21.) IT IS SO ORDERED. 24 || DATED: April 22, 2025 (yatta Bahar …