Becerra
Pacific Surgical Institute of Pain Management, Inc. v. Becerra
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 PACIFIC SURGICAL INSTITUTE OF Case No. 24-cv-01725-BAS-DTF
PAIN MANAGEMENT, INC.,
13
ORDER GRANTING
Petitioner, 14 RESPONDENT’S MOTION TO v. DISMISS PETITION FOR WRIT OF 15
MANDATE
ROBERT F. KENNEDY, JR.,
16 Respondent. (ECF No. 8) 17
18 19 20 Presently before the Court is Respondent’s Motion to Dismiss the Petition for Writ 21 of Mandate filed by Pacific Surgical Institute of Pain Management, Inc. (“Pacific 22 Surgical”). (ECF No. 8.) Pacific Surgical seeks mandamus relief concerning a dispute 23 over reimbursement under Title XVIII of the Social Security Act, 79 Stat. 291, as amended, 24 42 U.S.C. § 1395 et seq., commonly known as the Medicare Act. In Case No. 22-cv- 25 01521-BAS-WVG, this Court dismissed Petitioner’s prior petition for writ of mandamus 26 seeking to compel the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services (“HHS”) to pay 27 claims an administrative law judge (“ALJ”) had determined were covered by Medicare, 28 finding the Court…