John Racz v. Sircoya Williams

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaApril 23, 20252:25-cv-02778California977 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

11 JOHN RACZ, Case No. 2:25-cv-02778-JVS -KES

12 Petitioner,

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY

13 v.

PETITION SHOULD NOT BE

14 SIRCOYA WILLIAMS, Warden, DISMISSED AS SUCCESSIVE

15 Respondent.

16

17 On March 30, 2025, John Racz (“Petitioner”) filed a Petition for Writ of

18 Habeas Corpus by a Person in State Custody pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254.

19 (“Petition” at Dkt. 1.) As discussed more fully below, the Court orders Petitioner to

20 show cause why the Petition should not be dismissed as successive. 21 I. 22 BACKGROUND 23 Petitioner challenges his 2007 conviction of murder in the first degree under 24 Cal. Pen. Code § 187 in Los Angeles County Superior Court case number BA 25 320288, for which he was sentenced to twenty-five years to life. (Dkt. 1-2 at 6.) 26 Petitioner asserts habeas relief on the ground that, in 2021, Petitioner discovered the 27 notes of Detective Sally Fynan, which indicated that a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.