Bogavac

Bogavac v. El Pollo Loco, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaApril 23, 20253:25-cv-00339California6,995 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 13 DARKO BOGAVAC, an individual, on Case No. 25-cv-0339-MMA-BLM behalf of himself and all others similarly 14 situated and the general public, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S 15 MOTION TO REMAND Plaintiff,

16 v. [Doc. No. 6] 17 EL POLLO LOCO, INC., et al., 18 Defendants. 19 20 21 22 23 On February 21, 2025, Defendant El Pollo Loco, Inc. (“Defendant” or “E.P. 24 Loco”) filed a motion to dismiss Plaintiff Darko Bogavac’s (“Plaintiff”) first amended 25 complaint and strike class allegations therein. Doc. No. 3. Plaintiff responded in 26 opposition, to which Defendant replied. Doc. Nos. 7–8. On March 11, 2025, Plaintiff 27 filed a motion to remand the action to state court. Doc. No. 6. Defendant responded in 28 opposition, to which Plaintiff replied. Doc. Nos. 10, 12. 1 On March 26 and April 13, 2025, respectively, the Court found the motions to 2 dismiss and remand suitable for determination on the papers and without oral argument 3 pursuant to Federal Rule of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.