(HC) Iseli v. Johnson

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 21, 20252:25-cv-00532California825 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BRANDEN WILLIE ISELI, Case No. 2:25-cv-0532-JDP (HC) Petitioner, v. ORDER; FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

WILLIAM D. JOHNSON, Respondent. 16 Petitioner, a state prisoner, brings this action under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. ECF No. 1. It appears that this petition is successive and unauthorized. Petitioner appears to concede that his petition is an unauthorized successive petition, as he also moves this court to transfer his case to the Court of Appeals to obtain authorization for a successive petition. ECF No. 8. I will recommend that that petitioner’s motion to transfer be granted, and that the Clerk of Court be directed to administratively close the case. I will grant petitioner’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis. ECF No. 2. The petition is before me for preliminary review under Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases. Under Rule 4, the judge assigned to the habeas proceeding must examine the habeas petition and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.