Bailey

(HC) Cabrera v. Bailey

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 22, 20251:20-cv-01738California489 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 OMAR CABRERA, Case No. 1:20-cv-01738-KES-HBK (HC) 12 Petitioner, ORDER STRIKING SUPPLEMENTAL

PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS

13 v. CORPUS 14 O’BRIEN BAILEY, (Doc. No. 52). 15 Respondent. 16 17 18 On March 18, 2025, the undersigned submitted Findings and Recommendations that 19 Petitioner Omar Cabrera’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. No. 1, “Petition) be denied 20 and Petitioner be denied a certificate of appealability. (Doc. No. 47). Of relevance here, the 21 undersigned concluded Petitioner failed to state a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel 22 because the Petition lacked facts to support such a claim. (Id. at 37). Petitioner’s counsel sought 23 and obtained an extension until April 30, 2025 to file objections. (Doc. Nos. 50, 51). On April 24 17, 2025, Petitioner submitted a pro se Supplemental Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus “to add 25 new exhausted ‘facts’ to Claim Five for Ineffective Assistance of Counsel…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.