Haddad

(PC) Casey v. Haddad

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 22, 20251:21-cv-00855California2,002 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DOMINIQUE ZAFIR CASEY, Case No. 1:21-cv-00855-KES-SKO (PC)

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’

v. UNOPPOSED MOTION TO COMPEL AND

REQUEST FOR SANCTIONS

HADDAD, et al., (Doc. 64) Defendants.

16 Plaintiff Dominique Zafir Casey is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds on Plaintiff’s constitutional claims against Defendants Castro, Fernandez, and Haddad. I. INTRODUCTION The Court issued its Discovery and Scheduling Order on September 18, 2024. (Doc. 60.) On February 14, 2025, the Court granted Defendants’ motion to modify the discovery order. (Doc. 63.) Specifically, the deadline for completing discovery, including the filing of any motion to compel, was extended to March 20, 2025, and the dispositive motion filing deadline was extended to May 21, 2025. (Id. at 2.) On March 20, 2025,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.