Kelso

(PC) Puckett v. Kelso

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 22, 20251:23-cv-00054California750 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DURRELL ANTHONY PUCKETT, Case No. 1:23-cv-00054-KES-HBK (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S SIXTH

MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF

13 v. COUNSEL

14 HERNANDEZ, et al., (Doc. No. 131)

15 Defendants. ORDER STRIKING PLAINTIFF’S

PRETRIAL STATEMENT AS PREMATURE

16 (Doc. No. 132) 17

18 19 On April 14, 2025, Plaintiff filed a Pretrial Statement. (Doc. No. 132). The same day, 20 Plaintiff also filed his sixth Motion for Appointment of Counsel. (Doc. No. 131). Plaintiff, a 21 state prisoner, is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis on his Third Amended Complaint. 22 (Doc. Nos. 9, 73). Insofar as the Court is able to discern, Plaintiff seeks appointment of counsel, 23 citing issues related to prison conditions, mental health, and past trauma. (Doc. No. 131). 24 Specifically, Plaintiff states he is unable to prepare certain filings because prison staff repeatedly 25 search his cell and confiscate his property. (Id.). Plaintiff also…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.