(SS) Estorga Coleman v. Commissioner of Social Security
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANTONIA ESTORGA COLEMAN, Case No. 1:25-cv-00031-HBK Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PARTIES’
STIPULATED MOTION TO REMAND
v. UNDER SENTENCE FOUR OF 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), REVERSING FINAL DECISION AND COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL REMANDING CASE1
SECURITY,
(Doc. No. 11) Defendant. 16 17 18 Pending before the Court is the parties’ joint motion to remand filed April 22, 2025. (Doc. No. 11). Plaintiff Antonia Estorga Coleman and the Commissioner of Social Security agree that this case should be remanded for further administrative proceedings under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). (Id.). The United States Supreme Court held that the Social Security Act permits remand in conjunction with a judgment either affirming, reversing, or modifying the Secretary’s decision. See Melkonyan v. Sullivan, 501 U.S. 89, 97-98 (1991) (addressing issue of attorney’s fees under 26 1 Both parties have consented to the jurisdiction…