(SS) Estorga Coleman v. Commissioner of Social Security
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ANTONIA ESTORGA COLEMAN, Case No. 1:25-cv-00031-HBK 12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PARTIES’
STIPULATED MOTION TO REMAND
13 v. UNDER SENTENCE FOUR OF 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), REVERSING FINAL DECISION AND 14 COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL REMANDING CASE1
SECURITY,
15 (Doc. No. 11) Defendant. 16 17 18 19 Pending before the Court is the parties’ joint motion to remand filed April 22, 2025. 20 (Doc. No. 11). Plaintiff Antonia Estorga Coleman and the Commissioner of Social Security agree 21 that this case should be remanded for further administrative proceedings under sentence four of 22 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). (Id.). 23 The United States Supreme Court held that the Social Security Act permits remand in 24 conjunction with a judgment either affirming, reversing, or modifying the Secretary’s decision. 25 See Melkonyan v. Sullivan, 501 U.S. 89, 97-98 (1991) (addressing issue of attorney’s fees under 26 1 Both parties have consented to the jurisdiction…