McCoy

McCoy v. Green

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 22, 20251:25-cv-00238California1,721 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 LAKEITH L. MCCOY, Case No.: 1:25-cv-00238-KES-CDB 12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION TO

PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

13 v. (Doc. 2) 14 LISA GREEN, et al.,

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE IN WRITING

15 Defendants. WHY THE FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION (MONELL LIABILITY) SHOULD NOT BE 16 DISMISSED AS DUPLICATIVE OF CASE

NUMBER 1:15-CV-00768-KES-HBK (PC)

17 (Doc. 1) 18 21-DAY DEADLINE 19

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

20 MOTION FOR E-FILING PRIVILEGES

(Doc. 3) 21 22 Plaintiff Lakeith L. McCoy (“Plaintiff”) is proceeding pro se in this civil rights action 23 pursuant to 42 U.S.C. section 1983. Plaintiff initiated this action with the filing of a complaint on 24 February 24, 2025. (Doc. 1). 25 Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis 26 Plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se, did not pay the filing fee and instead filed an application 27 to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. (Doc. 2). The Court finds 1…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.