Fernandes
(PC) Thomas v. Fernandes
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MICHAEL THOMAS, Case No. 1:25-cv-00404-HBK (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION TO EXCEED
TWENTY-FIVE PAGE LIMIT
13 v.
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR
14 CARLO FERNANDES, PHYSICIAN AT SUBPOENA KVSP, et al., 15 (Doc. Nos. 2, 3) Defendants. 16 SCREENING ORDER FINDING
COMPLAINT FAILS TO COMPLY WITH
17 FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 8
AND DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO FILE AN
18 AMENDED COMPLAINT, STAND ON
COMPLAINT, OR FILE VOLUNTARY
19 DISMISSAL1 20 (Doc. No. 1) 21 MAY 28, 2025 DEADLINE
22
23 24 Pending before the Court for screening under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A is the pro se civil rights 25 complaint filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 by Plaintiff Michael Thomas—a former prisoner of the 26 27 1 This matter was referred to the undersigned pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §…