Keenan

(PC) Grissom v. Keenan

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 22, 20252:24-cv-00926California3,243 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 HOWARD DUPREE GRISSOM, No. 2:24-cv-00926 SCR P Plaintiff, v. ORDER STEFANIE KEENAN, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state inmate proceeding pro se with a civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Before the court are plaintiff’s complaint for screening (ECF No. 1) and application to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 2). IN FORMA PAUPERIS Plaintiff has requested leave to proceed without paying the full filing fee for this action, under 28 U.S.C. § 1915. Plaintiff has submitted a declaration showing that he cannot afford to pay the entire filing fee. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2). Accordingly, plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. This means that plaintiff is allowed to pay the $350.00 filing fee in monthly installments that are taken from the inmate’s trust account rather than in one lump sum. 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914(a). As part of this order, the prison is…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.